Clever Geek Handbook

SpaceX explosion

SpaceX loses another Starship prototype in massive explosion - The ... SearchSubscribeWhy subscribe?TrendingSpace is supported by its audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. SpaceX's latest prototype exploded just after an engine test Friday (May 29), erupting in a dramatic fireball at the spaceflight company's South Texas proving grounds.

The Starship SN4 prototype exploded at about 1:49 p.m. CDT (2:49 p.m. EDT/1849 GMT) at SpaceX's test facility near Boca Chica, Texas according to a video provided by the . The explosion occurred about a minute after a short test of its Raptor rocket engine, but it was unclear what caused the conflagration.

Related:



SpaceX's Starship SN4 rocket prototype explodes on its test stand near Boca Chica, Texas on May 29, 2020. (Image credit: )SpaceX yesterday as part of its preparations for an upcoming launch test that could have carried the rocket about 500 feet (150 meters) up. That same day, SpaceX received a launch license for its Starship tests from the Federal Aviation Administration.

As its name suggests, the Starship SN4 vehicle is the latest in a series of stainless steel prototypes has built to test technologies required for a truly massive space launch system: the 165-foot-tall (50 meters) Starship rocket and its Super Heavy megabooster. That vehicle is the one SpaceX hopes will carry up to 100 people at a time to space and, eventually, on to Mars.

Last month, as one of three commercial spacecraft that could land astronauts on the moon for the agency's Artemis program in 2024.



While several of the Starship prototypes of exploded, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has said the company is committed to learning from each test and forging ahead.

The company's first prototype, the Starship Mk1, . Its successor SN1 . The next iteration, SN2, in March. The SN3 prototype, meanwhile, . Musk later said that leaky valves were the culprit and that it would be fixed on the next vehicle.

The Starship SN4 was by far the longest-lived and most-tested Starship prototype to date. Today's static-fire engine test was the fifth for the vehicle, the most of any to date.

SpaceX was already building another Starship prototype, the SN5, at the time of today's SN4 failure. That vehicle will likely take center stage for the company's next round of tests.

You can see another view of the explosion in .

SpaceX's Starship SN4 explosion comes as the company is counting down to another major launch on a different rocket.

A SpaceX Falcon 9 rocketand Crew Dragon spacecraft are scheduled to launch two NASA astronauts to the International Space Station in a historic test flight.

The mission, called , is currently set to launch no earlier than Saturday (May 30) at 3:22 p.m. EDT (1922 GMT) from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. It will be SpaceX's first human spaceflight, and the first orbital crewed launch from the United States since NASA's space shuttle fleet retired in July 2011.

Bad weather prevented the Demo-2 mission's initial launch attempt on Wednesday (May 27). (May 30) before likely standing down for a few days, NASA officials have said.

Email Tariq Malik ator follow him. Follow us, and .



For a limited time, you can take out a digital subscription to any of for just $2.38 per month, or 45% off the standard price for the first three months.

to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at:

10 CommentsShow more comments Sign Up for e-mail newslettersGet breaking space news and the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!

Thank you for signing up to Space. You will receive a verification email shortly.

There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.

More from Space... VIDEO: SpaceX's latest Starship prototype destroyed by fiery ... "Death in space" redirects here. For death in specifically outer space conditions, see . disintegrates 73 seconds after its 1986 launch resulting in the death of all seven crew members.This article lists verifiable spaceflight-related accidents and incidents resulting in human fatality or near-fatality during flight or training for crewed space missions, and testing, assembly, preparation or flight of crewed and robotic spacecraft. Not included are accidents or incidents associated with (ICBM) tests, fatality or injury to test animals, uncrewed space flights not resulting in human fatality or serious injury, or or projects of . Also not included are , which are considered by a majority of historians.

As of 2020, there have been 15 and 4 fatalities during spaceflight. Astronauts have also died while training for space missions, such as the launch pad fire which killed an entire crew of three. There have also been some non-astronaut fatalities during spaceflight-related activities.

Astronauts Memorial Plaque at Cape Canaveral (2015) The memorial on the Moon includes most spaceflight-related fatalities up to 1971.Contents Astronaut fatalities (In the statistics below, "astronaut" is applied to all space travellers to avoid the use of "astronaut/cosmonaut".)During spaceflight As of February 2020, in-flight accidents have killed 15 astronauts and 4 cosmonauts, in five separate incidents. Three of them had flown above the (edge of space), and one was intended to do so. In each case, the entire crew was killed. The current statistical fatality rate is 3.2 percent.

astronauts who died on duty are memorialized at the at the in . Cosmonauts who died on duty under the were generally honored by burial at the in . No Soviet or Russian cosmonauts have died during spaceflight since 1971.

Orbital spaceflight fatalitiesDateIncidentMissionFatalitiesDescription24 April 1967Parachute failureThe one-day mission was plagued by a series of mishaps with the new spacecraft type, culminating with its not opening properly after . Komarov was killed when the capsule hit the ground at high speed.The Soyuz 1 crash site coordinates are , 3 kilometers (1.9 mi) west of Karabutak, in the , about 275 kilometers (171 mi) east-southeast of . In a small park on the side of the road is a memorial monument: a black column with a bust of Komarov at the top.

30 June 1971Decompression in space

The crew of were killed after undocking from after a three-week stay. A cabin vent valve construction defect caused it to open at service module separation. The recovery team found the crew dead. These three are (as of 2020) the only human fatalities in space (above 100 kilometers (330,000 ft)).The Soyuz 11 landing coordinates are , 90 kilometers (56 mi) southwest of , , , and about 550 kilometers (340 mi) northeast of , in open flat country far from any populated area. In a small circular fenced area at the site is a memorial monument in the form of a three-sided metallic column. Near the top of the column on each side is the engraved image of the face of a crew member set into a stylized triangle.

1 February 2003Vehicle disintegration on re-entry –





The Space Shuttle was lost as it returned from a two-week mission, . Damage to the shuttle's led to structural failure of the shuttle's left wing and the spacecraft ultimately broke apart during reentry at an altitude of under 65 km. Investigation revealed damage to the reinforced carbon-carbon leading edge wing panel resulted from the impact of a piece of foam insulation that broke away from the external tank during the launch.The vehicle broke up over the and fell in fragments over eastern and central .

Spaceflight fatalities below theDateIncidentMissionFatalitiesDescription15 November 1967Control failureDuring X-15 Flight 191, Adams' seventh flight, the plane had an electrical problem followed by control problems at the of its flight. The pilot may also have become disoriented. During reentry from a 266,000 ft (50.4 mile, 81.1 km) apogee, the X-15 yawed and went into a spin at Mach 5. The pilot recovered, but went into a Mach 4.7 inverted dive. Excessive loading led to structural breakup at about 65,000 feet (19.8 km). Adams was posthumously awarded , as his flight had passed an altitude of 50 miles (80.5 km),28 January 1986Launch booster failure, vehicle disintegration during launch –





The Space Shuttle was destroyed 73 seconds after lift-off on at an altitude of 15 kilometers (49,000 ft). The investigation found that cold weather conditions caused an seal to fail, allowing hot gases from the shuttle to impinge on the and booster strut. The strut and aft end of the tank failed, allowing the top of the SRB to rotate into the top of the tank. Challenger was thrown sideways into the 1.8 windstream and broke up with the loss of all seven crew members. NASA investigators determined they may have survived the spacecraft disintegration, possibly unconscious from ; some tried to activate their emergency oxygen. Any survivors of the breakup were killed, however, when the largely intact hit the water at 320 km/h (200 mph), about 32 km (20 miles) east of at 28.64 degrees north, 80.28 degrees west. About half of the vehicle's remains were never recovered, and fragments still washed ashore as long as a decade later, on the coast of .During training or testing In addition to accidents during spaceflights, 11 astronauts, test pilots, and other personnel have been killed during training or tests.

Fatalities during training or testing for spaceflightIncidentDateMission (program)FatalitiesDescriptionFire in altitude chamber23 March 1961( Group 1) First space-related fatality. During a 15-day endurance experiment in a low-pressure altitude chamber with at least 50% atmosphere, cosmonaut trainee Bondarenko dropped an -soaked cloth onto an . He suffered over most of his body and face, and died in a hospital 16 hours later.Training jet crash31 October 1964() Before being selected for a crew, Freeman was flying a jet trainer on landing approach to near Houston, TX, when a the left side of the cockpit . Shards of entered the engine intake and caused both engines to . Freeman too close to the ground for his parachute to open properly.28 February 1966 See and Bassett attempted to land their T-38 at in in bad weather, and crashed into the adjacent factory, where they were going for simulator training for their flight.Fire during spacecraft test27 January 1967

An electrical fire in the cabin spread quickly in the pure oxygen atmosphere and claimed the lives of all three Apollo 1 crew members during a "plugs-out" test in preparation for their planned February 21 launch.Training jet crash5 October 1967() Williams, flying alone in a T-38 jet from , Florida to , Texas, crashed due to an aileron control mechanical failure, about 15 miles (24 km) north of , Florida. Williams ejected too low for the parachute to open properly. Williams had been selected as lunar module pilot on an Apollo crew with commander and command module pilot .Training jet crash8 December 1967() The first astronaut, selected for the Air Force program, was killed when his jet crashed at , , while practicing a series of high speed, quick descent landings with Major Harvey Royer as pilot in command. Both crewmen ejected; Royer survived with injuries, but Lawrence, the instructor pilot, was found in his ejection seat, parachute not fully deployed.Drowned during water recovery training11 July 1993(Soviet Air Force Cosmonaut Training Group 11) Sergei Yuriyevich Vozovikov was a member of the Soviet Air Force Cosmonaut Training Group 11. His Cosmonaut training was from 1 October 1991 to 6 March 1992. He drowned 11 July 1993 during water recovery training in the , near , Russia.31 October 2014 PF04 was killed and was seriously injured when disintegrated during a powered atmospheric test flight over California due to premature deployment of the .Non-fatal incidents during spaceflight Apart from actual disasters, a number of missions resulted in some very near misses and also some training accidents that nearly resulted in deaths.

IncidentDateMissionDescriptionSeparation failure12 April 1961After retrofire, the unexpectedly remained attached to the by a bundle of wires. The two halves of the craft were supposed to separate ten seconds after retrofire. But they did not separate until 10 minutes after retrofire, when the wire bundle finally burned through. The spacecraft went into wild gyrations at the beginning of reentry, before the wires burned through and the reentry module settled into the proper reentry attitude.Landing capsule sank in water21 July 1961After splashdown in the , the hatch malfunctioned and blew, filling the capsule with water and almost drowning , who managed to escape before it sank. Grissom then had to deal with a spacesuit that was rapidly filling with water, but managed to get into the helicopter's retrieval collar and was lifted to safety. The spacecraft was recovered in 1999, having settled 300 nmi (560 km; 350 mi) southeast of Cape Canaveral in 15,000 ft (4,600 m) of seawater. An unexploded , designed for sound fixing and ranging in case the craft sank, had failed and had to be dealt with when it was recovered from the ocean floor in 1999.Spacesuit or airlock design fault18 March 1965The mission featured the world's first , by . After his twelve minutes outside, Leonov's spacesuit inflated in the vacuum to the point where he could not reenter the airlock. He opened a valve to allow some of the suit's pressure to bleed off, and was barely able to get back inside the capsule after suffering side effects of . Because the spacecraft was so cramped, the crew could not keep to their reentry schedule and landed 386 km off course in deep forest. They spent a night sheltering in the capsule from the cold, and a second night in a temporary hut built by rescuers before skiing with them to a clearing where a helicopter flew them to .Engine shutdown at launch12 December 1965The first on-pad shutdown in the US Manned Program. orbiting 185 miles (298 km) directly over Missile Row witnessed the event and reported they could clearly see the momentary exhaust plume before shutdown.Equipment failure17 March 1966A maneuvering thruster refused to shut down and put their capsule into an uncontrolled spin. After the Gemini spun up to one revolution per second, regained control by switching from the main attitude control system to the reentry system. Mission rules required a landing as soon as possible once the reentry thrusters were used, causing an early end to the flight.Separation failure18 January 1969Harrowing reentry and landing when the capsule's service module initially refused to separate, causing the spacecraft to begin reentry faced the wrong way. The service module broke away before the capsule would have been destroyed, and so it made a rough but survivable landing far off course in the .Struck twice by lightning during launch14 November 1969Two lightning strikes during launch. The first strike, at 36 seconds after liftoff, knocked the three fuel cells offline and the craft switched to battery power automatically. The second strike, at 52 seconds after liftoff, knocked the onboard guidance platform offline. Four temperature sensors on the outside of the Lunar Module were burnt out and four measuring devices in the reaction control system failed temporarily. Fuel cell power was restored about four minutes later. The astronauts spent additional time in Earth orbit to make sure the spacecraft was functional before firing their S-IVB third stage engine and departing for the Moon.Struck by camera during splashdown24 November 1969 Astronaut Alan Bean was struck above the right eyebrow by a 16mm movie camera when the spacecraft in the ocean. The camera broke free from its storage place. Bean suffered a , and a 1.25 cm cut above the eyebrow that required stitches.Premature engine shutdown11 April 1970During launch, the second stage experienced a premature shutdown on one of its five engines. The center engine shut down two minutes early. The remaining engines on the second and third stages were burned a total of 34 seconds longer to compensate. It was later determined that the shutdown was caused by of the engine. and were successfully achieved.Equipment failure13 April 1970The crew came home safely after a violent rupture of a liquid oxygen tank deprived the Service Module of its ability to produce electrical power, crippling their spacecraft en route to the Moon. They survived the loss of use of their command ship by relying on the as a "life boat" to provide life support and power for the trip home.One of three main parachutes failed7 August 1971During descent, the three main parachutes opened successfully. However, when the remaining reaction control system fuel was jettisoned, one parachute was damaged by the discarded fuel causing it to collapse. Spacecraft and crew still safely, at a slightly higher than normal velocity, on the two remaining main parachutes. If a second parachute had failed, the spacecraft would probably have been crushed on impact with the ocean, according to a NASA official.Separation failure5 April 1975 The mission nearly ended in disaster when the rocket suffered a second-stage separation failure during launch. This also interrupted the craft's attitude, causing the vehicle to accelerate towards the Earth and triggering an emergency reentry sequence. Due to the downward acceleration, the crew experienced an acceleration of 21.3 g rather than the nominal 15 g for an abort. Upon landing, the vehicle rolled down a hill and stopped just short of a high cliff. The crew survived, but Lazarev, the mission commander, suffered internal injuries due to the severe and was never able to fly again.Chemical poisoning24 July 1975 During final descent and parachute deployment, the U.S. crew were exposed to 300 µL/L of toxic (Reaction Control System ) fumes venting from the spacecraft and reentering a cabin air intake, because a switch was left in the wrong position. 400µL/L is fatal. lost consciousness for a short time. The crew members suffered from burning sensations of their eyes, faces, noses, throats and lungs. quickly broke out emergency oxygen masks and put one on Brand and gave one to . The crew were exposed to the toxic fumes from 24,000 ft (7.3 km) down to landing. About an hour after landing the crew developed chemical-induced pneumonia and their lungs had . They experienced shortness of breath and were hospitalized in . The crew spent five days in the hospital, followed by a week of observation in semi-isolation. By July 30, their chest appeared to return to normal except for Slayton; he was diagnosed with a benign lesion, unrelated to the gas exposure, which was later removed.Landing capsule sank in water16 October 1976The capsule broke through the surface of a frozen lake and was dragged underwater by its parachute. The crew was saved after a very difficult rescue operation.Engine malfunction12 April 1979Engine failure forced the mission to be aborted. It was the first-ever failure of a during orbital operations. The crew, commander and cosmonaut , suffered a steep ballistic re-entry, but were safely recovered. SRB ignition shock wave overpressure reached design limits of orbiter structure12 April 1981 During launch, the Solid Rocket Booster ignition shock wave overpressure was four times greater than expected (2.0 psi or 14 kPa measured vs 0.5 psi or 3.4 kPa predicted). Some of the aft structures on reached their design limits (2.0 psi) from the overpressure. The overpressure bent four struts that supported two RCS fuel tanks in the nose of Columbia and the orbiter's locked body flap was pushed up and down 6 in (15 cm) by the shock wave. and in the crew cabin received a 3-G jolt from the shock wave. An improved water spray shock wave damping system had to be installed on the launch pad prior to launch.Fire in launch vehicle26 September 1983A fuel spillage before the planned liftoff caused the vehicle to be engulfed in flames. The crew was narrowly saved by the activation of their launch escape system, with the rocket exploding two seconds later.Leaked hydrazine fuel fire and explosion8 December 1983In the last two minutes of the mission, during 's final approach to the runway, hydrazine fuel leaked onto hot surfaces of two of the three onboard (APU) in the aft compartment of the shuttle and caught fire. About 15 minutes after landing, hydrazine fuel trapped in the APU control valves exploded, destroying the valves in both APUs. The fire also damaged nearby wiring. The fire stopped when the supply of leaked fuel was exhausted. All of this was discovered the next day when technicians removed an access panel and discovered the area blackened and scorched. It is believed that leaked in orbit and froze, stopping the leak. After returning, the leak restarted and ignited when combined with from the atmosphere. There were no injuries during the incident.Space Shuttle in-flight engine failure29 July 1985 Five minutes, 45 seconds into ascent, one of three aboard Challenger shut down prematurely due to a spurious high temperature reading. At about the same time, a second main engine almost shut down from a similar problem, but this was observed and inhibited by a fast acting . The failed SSME resulted in an trajectory, whereby the shuttle achieves a lower than planned orbital altitude. Had the second engine failed within about 20 seconds of the first, a abort might have been necessary. No bailout option existed until after mission STS-51-L, the Challenger disaster. But even with that option, a bailout (a "contingency abort") would never be considered when an "intact abort" option exists, and after five minutes of normal flight it would always exist unless a serious flight control failure or some other major problem beyond engine shutdown occurred.Sensor failure6 September 1988At the end of the mission, Soviet cosmonaut and cosmonaut undocked from in the spacecraft . During descent they suffered a computer software problem combined with a sensor problem. The deorbit engine on the TM-5 spacecraft which was to propel them into , did not behave as expected. During an attempted burn, the computer shut off the engines prematurely, believing the spacecraft was out of alignment. Lyakhov determined that they were not, in fact, out of alignment, and asserted that the problem was caused by conflicting signals picked up by the alignment sensors caused by solar glare. With the problem apparently solved, two orbits later he restarted to deorbit engines. But the engines shut off again. The flight director decided that they would have to remain in orbit an extra day (a full revolution of the Earth), so they could determine what the problem was. During this time it was realised that during the second attempted engine burn, the computer had tried to execute the program which was used to dock with Mir several months earlier during . After reprogramming the computer, the next attempt was successful, and the crew safely landed on 7 September.Thermal tile damage6 December 1988 ' Thermal Protection System tiles sustained unusually severe damage during this flight. Ablative insulating material from the right-hand solid rocket booster nose cap had hit the orbiter about 85 seconds into the flight, as seen in footage of the ascent. The crew made an inspection of the Shuttle's impacted starboard side using the Shuttle's robot arm, but the limited resolution and range of the cameras made it impossible to determine the full extent of the tile damage. Following reentry, more than 700 tiles were found to be damaged including one that was missing entirely. STS-27 was the most heavily damaged Shuttle to return to Earth safely.Spacesuit puncture8 April 1991During an , a small rod (palm bar) in a glove of EV2 astronaut 's punctured the suit. Somehow, the astronaut's hand conformed to the puncture and sealed it, preventing any detectable depressurization. During post-flight debriefings, Apt said after the second EVA, when he removed the gloves, his right hand index finger had an abrasion behind the knuckle. A postflight inspection of the right hand glove found the palm bar of the glove penetrating a restraint and glove bladder into the index finger side of the glove. NASA found air leakage with the bar in place was 3.8 , well within the specification of 8.0 SCCM. They said if the bar had come out of the hole, the leak still would not have been great enough to activate the secondary oxygen pack. The suit would, however, have shown a high oxygen rate indication.Explosive release device punctured cargo bay bulkhead12 September 1993 While releasing the Advanced Communications Technology Satellite from the payload bay, both the primary and backup explosive release devices detonated. Only the primary device was supposed to have detonated. Large metal bands holding the satellite in place were ripped away, causing flying debris. The debris punctured the orbiter's payload bay bulkhead leading to the main engine compartment, damaging wiring trays and payload bay thermal insulation blankets. The puncture in the bulkhead was 3 mm by 13 mm in size. The crew was uninjured and the damage was not great enough to endanger the shuttle. The satellite was undamaged.Eye injury from Mir exercise equipment18 May 1995While exercising on the EO-18/NASA 1/ mission, astronaut suffered an eye injury. He was using an exercise device, doing deep knee bends, with elastic straps. One of the straps slipped off of his foot, flew up, and hit him in the eye. Later, even a small amount of light caused pain in his eye. He said using the eye was, "like looking at the world through gauze." An at Mission Control-Moscow prescribed steroid drops and the eye healed.Fire on board23 February 1997There was a fire on board the Mir space station when a canister used to generate oxygen leaked. The fire was extinguished after about 90 seconds, but smoke did not clear for several minutes.Fuel cell failure8 April 1997Fuel cell #2 aboard unexpectedly failed on Day 4 in orbit, forcing an early end to the flight. The mission touched down safely, and the crew was reflown with the same mission plan on . Collision in space25 June 1997At Mir, during a re-docking test with the cargo freighter, the freighter collided with the module and solar arrays of the Mir space station. This damaged the solar arrays and the collision punctured a hole in the Spektr module and the space station began depressurizing. The onboard crew of two Russians and one visiting NASA astronaut were able to close off the Spektr module from the rest of Mir after quickly cutting cables and hoses blocking the hatch closure.Main engine electrical short and hydrogen leak23 July 1999 Five seconds after liftoff, an electrical short knocked out controllers for two shuttle main engines. The engines automatically switched to their backup controllers. Had a further short shut down two engines, Columbia would have ditched in the ocean, although the crew could have possibly bailed out. Concurrently a pin came loose inside one engine and ruptured a cooling line, allowing a hydrogen fuel leak. This caused premature fuel exhaustion, but the vehicle safely achieved a slightly lower orbit. Had the failure propagated further, a risky transatlantic or would have been required. Toxic ammonia leak during EVA10 February 2001/During EVA 1 on the mission, NASA astronauts and were connecting cooling lines on the International Space Station while working to install the . A defective quick-disconnect valve allowed 5% of the ammonia cooling supply to escape into space. The escaping ammonia froze on the spacesuit of astronaut Curbeam as he struggled to close the valve. His helmet and suit were coated in ammonia crystals an inch thick. Mission Control instructed Curbeam to remain outside for an entire orbit to allow the Sun to evaporate the frozen ammonia from his spacesuit. When they returned to the airlock, the astronauts pressurized, vented and then repressurized the air lock to purge any remaining toxic ammonia. After they removed their spacesuits, the crew wore oxygen masks for another 20 minutes to allow life-support systems in the airlock to further filter the air. No injuries resulted from the incident.Ballistic reentry, injured shoulder3 May 2003The capsule had a malfunction during its return to Earth from the ISS mission and performed a ballistic reentry. The crew was subjected to about 8 to 9 Gs during reentry. The capsule landed 500 km (310 mi) from the intended landing target. In addition, after landing the capsule was dragged about 15 metres (49 ft) by its parachute and ended up on its side in a hard landing. Astronaut injured his shoulder and was placed on a stretcher in a rescue helicopter and did not take part in post-landing ceremonies.Unplanned rolls during ascent29 September 2004On suborbital flight , the first of two flights that won the for exceeding 100 km (62 mi) in altitude, astronaut experienced 29 unplanned rolls during and after powered ascent. The rolls began at 50 seconds into the engine burn. The burn was stopped 11 seconds early after burning a total of 76 seconds. After engine cutoff, the craft continued rolling while coasting to apogee. The roll was finally brought under control after apogee using the craft's reaction jets. SpaceShipOne landed safely and Mike Melvill was uninjured.Separation failure19 April 2008Reentry mishap similar to that suffered by Soyuz 5 in 1969. The service module failed to completely separate from the reentry vehicle and caused it to face the wrong way during the early portion of aerobraking. As with Soyuz 5, the service module eventually separated and the reentry vehicle completed a rough but survivable landing. Following the Russian news agency 's report, this was widely reported as life-threatening while urged caution pending an investigation of the vehicle. South Korean astronaut was hospitalized after her return to South Korea due to injuries caused by the rough return voyage in the Soyuz TMA-11 spacecraft. The South Korean Science Ministry said that the astronaut had a minor injury to her neck muscles and had bruised her spinal column.Aborted spacewalk after water leak in suit16 July 2013During EVA-23, astronaut reported that water was steadily leaking into his helmet. Flight controllers elected to abort the EVA immediately, and Parmitano made his way back to the , followed by fellow astronaut . The airlock began repressurizing after a 1-hour and 32 minute spacewalk, and by this time Parmitano was having difficulty seeing, hearing, and speaking due to the amount of water in his suit. After repressurization, Expedition 36 commander and crewmembers and quickly removed Parmitano's helmet and soaked up the water with towels. Despite the incident, Parmitano was reported to be in good spirits and suffered no injury. By December, 2013, NASA had determined the leak to have been caused by a design flaw in the liquid coolant. The designers failed to take into account the physics of water in zero-g, which unintentionally allowed coolant water to mix with the air supply.Hole detected in station30 August 2018 attached toGround controllers detected a dip in cabin pressure, which astronauts traced to a 2-millimeter hole in , which was quickly patched up by Soyuz commander with .Launch booster failure, ballistic re-entry11 October 2018The crew reported feeling weightless; mission control declared a rocket had failed. An emergency was declared and the spacecraft carrying the crew was separated from the rocket. It returned to Earth in a (sharper than normal angle), and the crew experienced 6.7 during the landing. The crew did not need immediate medical care when recovered. Investigation determined the ball joint supporting one of the side boosters had been deformed during assembly; the damaged joint prevented proper separation despite proper activation of the separation motors; the booster re-contacted the core stage, inflicting further damage.Non-fatal incidents during training Main article: Spaceflight-related accidents and incidents during assembly, testing, and preparation for flight of crewed and uncrewed spacecraft have occasionally resulted in injuries or the loss of since the earliest days of space programs.

Non-astronaut fatalities Fatalities caused by rocket explosions This list excludes deaths caused by military operations, either by deliberate detonations, or accidental during production - for example German V-2 rockets reportedly caused on average an estimated 6 deaths per operational rocket just during its production stages.

DatePlaceDeadRocketDescription17 May 1930, 1, "first casualty of the modern space age", killed by rocket engine explosion.2 February 1931Mount Redoria near , 1A liquid fueled, 132-pound (60 kg) , that was constructed by American physicist, Dr. , exploded during tests, killing a mechanic and injuring three others. Dr. Lyon was not present when the explosion occurred.10 October 19333 Explosion in rocket manufacturing room of 16 July 1934, Germany3Research project under the supervision of killed Kurt Wahmke and two assistants as part of the rocket development, during a fuel test of a premixed hydrogen peroxide/alcohol propellant when the fuel tank exploded.24 October 1960, 78The caused by ignition of second-stage engines on the pad.24 October 1963, 7–8On the same day as the Nedelin catastrophe, another catastrophe took place: due to the evaporation of fuel and a short circuit, a fire took the lives of 7 or 8 people. Since then, 24 October is considered a "Black Day", and Russia has not launched rockets on that day.14 April 1964, US3The third stage of a had just been joined to the satellite in the spin test facility building at Cape Kennedy. Eleven workers were in the room when the 205 kg (452 lb) of solid fuel in the third stage ignited. Sidney Dagle, 29; Lot D. Gabel, 51, and John Fassett, 30, were severely burned and later died of their injuries. Eight others were injured, but survived. The ignition was caused by a spark of .7 May 1964, 3Mail rocket built by exploded and debris hit crowd of spectators.14 December 1966, USSR1: Second unmanned test flight. Launch escape system fired 27 minutes after an aborted launch causing a fire and subsequent explosion when pad workers had already returned to the launch pad.26 June 1973, 9 launch vehicleLaunch explosion of rocket18 March 1980, USSR48 launch vehicle a rocket7 September 1990, CA 1A launch vehicle solid rocket booster was being hoisted by a crane into a rocket test stand at Edwards AFB, California. The bottom section of the booster broke free, hit the ground and ignited. One person, Alan M. Quimby, 27, a civilian employee of , was killed and 9 others were injured in the accident.9 August 1991, Japan1 launch vehicleEngineer Arihiro Kanaya, 23, was conducting a high pressure endurance test on a pipe used in the first stage rocket engine of the H-2 (H-II) launch vehicle when it exploded. The explosion caused a 14 cm (5.5 in) thick door in the testing room to fall on Kanaya and fracture his skull, killing him. The accident happened at the in , Japan.27 February 1993, 1Bror Thornéus, a technician from Sweden was killed when a sounding rocket ignited during testing of its ignition system at the European Sounding Rocket Range (), in northern Sweden.26 January 1995, 6+ veered off course after launch15 February 1996, China6–100, a , veered off course immediately after launch, crashing in the nearby village 22 seconds later, destroying 80 houses. According to official Chinese reports there were 6 fatalities and 57 injuries resulting from the incident, but other accounts estimated 100 fatalities. 15 October 2002, 1, a , exploded 29 seconds after launch, killing a soldier, Ivan Marchenko, and injuring 8 others. Fragments of the rocket started a forest fire nearby, and a Block D strap-on booster caused damage to the launchpad.22 August 2003, 21: Explosion of an uncrewed rocket during launch preparations26 July 2007, 3engine test for Explosion during a test of rocket systems by during a nitrous oxide injector testOther non-astronaut fatalities Incident datePlaceDeadAssociated mission/vehicleDescription16 May 1968, US1Pad worker William B. Estes, 46, was killed while hooking up an 8-inch (20 cm) high-pressure water line to the mobile service structure on Kennedy Space Center A, which should not have been pressurized at the time. The cap blew off with 180 psi pressure, striking him in the chest.2 March 1978Florida, US1 Robert E. "Champ" Murphy, was injured in an incident involving a Halon cylinder. He lost his foot and died on 8 June 1985 as a result of Halon exposure.19 March 1981, US3 due to nitrogen atmosphere in the aft engine compartment of during a . Five workers were involved in the incident. John Bjornstad died at the scene; Forrest Cole went into a coma and died two weeks later, and Nick Mullon died 14 years later from complications of injuries sustained.5 May 1981, US1Construction worker Anthony E. Hill, 22, fell more than 100 feet (30 m) from the Kennedy Space Center B service structure. Workers were preparing LC-39B for a planned September 1981 launch of the Space Shuttle Columbia.10 June 1981 / , US2 (USFWS) firefighters Scott Maness and Beau Sauselein died while fighting a fire on refuge grounds at Kennedy Space Center. The incident prompted improvements in the USFWS wildfire program to support spaceport operations.4 December 1985, US1Carl Reich, 49, of , an iron worker employed by of , fell 18 stories from the mobile service structure of the SLC-6 Space Shuttle launch complex, while bolting a platform onto the structure.30 January 1986, US1NASA engineer Elmer Andrew Thomas, 69, of suffered a heart attack while watching the from a NASA viewing room. He died in the hospital two days later.4 May 1988, Nevada, US2 and otherBruce Halker and Roy Westerfield lost their lives due to the , an explosion of a factory that produced for boosters of the Space Shuttle and other launchers.27 July 1989Kennedy Space Center, US1 Electrical worker Clarence E. Halley, an employee of , fell 20 feet to his death at the .22 December 1989, US1A worker refurbishing the 11th level of the Cape Canaveral, Atlas Launch Complex 36B launch tower, was killed when an air hose he was using was caught by the pad elevator. The hose wrapped around the worker and pulled him into the elevator shaft, crushing him. The pad was being refurbished for commercial satellite launches by General Dynamics starting in 1990.5 May 1995, 2Two technicians, Luc Celle and Jean-Claude Dhainaut, died from due to major nitrogen leak in confined area of umbilical mast at Ariane 5 launch area during cryogenic M1 main stage testing.8 July 2001, US1Worker disconnecting a coupling on a temporary pipe used to purge a liquid oxygen system near . Unexpected buildup of pressure caused the coupling to break loose and strike the employee in the head.24 August 2001, US1Painter Constantine "Gus" Valantasis died after a fall at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station.1 October 2001, US1 Crane operator Bill Brooks was killed in an industrial accident at .12 May 2002, 8Workers repairing the roof of the N-1/ vehicle assembly building died when the roof suffered a total structural collapse and crashed 80 meters (260 ft) to the ground. Buran Shuttle was destroyed.27 March 2003, US2During debris recovery efforts following the , Forest Service employee Charles Krenek of Lufkin, Texas and Pilot Jules F. 'Buzz' Mier, Jr. of Arizona were killed when their search chopper crashed in near the town of . Also injured were Matt Tschacher, U.S. Forest Service, South Dakota; Richard Lange, United Space Alliance at Kennedy Space Center in Florida; and Ronnie Dale, NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.13 September 20031One contract worker was killed in a "small" explosion during maintenance modifications at a solid rocket fuel mixing facility.24 February 2004, 6After curing process of an experimental solid propellant segment weighing 14.5 tonnes, during removal of bottom plate from casting assembly, propellant within segment caught fire resulting in death of four engineers and two assistants. Three workers escaped the inferno with burn injuries. Cast Cure facility building suffered extensive damage.17 March 2006, US1Steven Owens, a roofer employed by a subcontractor for Kennedy Space Center base operations contractor Space Gateway Company, died after falling from the roof of the Space Life Sciences Lab.5 May 2010, US2Jim Hawke and Jerry Grimes, employees of Amtec Corp, died after a explosion in a test area. 14 March 2011, USA1James D. Vanover, a swing-arm contractor for United Launch Alliance, fell to his death during preparations for a Space Shuttle mission. The death was later ruled a suicide.9 November 2013, Russia2Two workers cleaning out a propellant tank died when exposed to poisonous nitrogen tetroxide gases within the tank14 June 2017, 2An ISS resupply mission, debris from the launch caused a wildfire which killed Yuri Khatyushin, who was employed to recover rocket debris. Vyacheslav Tyts was injured and died a few days afterward in hospital.See also Notes References Books and journals

Other online sources

External links [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAutoLogin/start?type=1x1&mobile=1]Retrieved from "" SpaceX Starship Explosion May 2020 | SpaceX SN4 Blows Up - Video Cookie banner We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audiences come from. To learn more or opt-out, read our . Please also read our and , which became effective December 20, 2019.

By choosing I Accept, you consent to our use of cookies and other tracking technologies.

I Accept Filed under:

A leaky valve started one serious explosion

By Jul 15, 2019, 5:40pm EDT Share this story Share All sharing options for: SpaceX finally reveals cause of April spacecraft explosion SpaceX says it has figured out what caused one of its spacecraft to explode during a ground test in April. A valve accidentally leaked some of the vehicle’s propellant, starting a chain reaction that caused the spacecraft to burst apart. Now that the cause has been identified, SpaceX says it is replacing these parts in all future versions of the vehicle to make sure this explosive leak doesn’t happen again.

The spacecraft that SpaceX lost was a test version of the company’s Crew Dragon, a capsule that’s being built for NASA to take astronauts to and from the International Space Station. This particular capsule was the very first Crew Dragon that SpaceX had ever launched into space. In March, the vehicle — without a crew — successfully docked with the ISS and then returned back to Earth during a flawless test mission. But during routine tests on the vehicle on April 20th, the capsule violently broke apart and spewed orange gas into the sky.

SpaceX immediately to figure out what caused the explosion, and the company has been working with NASA ever since. But up until six weeks ago, . With the discovery of the leak, the company now says the investigation is about 80 percent complete. “It’s hard to tell... how much time we need to close this out,” Hans Koenigsman, vice president of build and flight reliability at SpaceX, said during a press conference. “But you want to make sure that the capsule — everything — you want to make sure that we find all the right corrective actions.”

“It’s something that the components should not have done.”The company believes that the problem originated with the Crew Dragon’s emergency abort system, which consists of a series of small thrusters embedded within the capsule. If all goes well during a mission, these tiny thrusters are never really meant to be used. But if there is some kind of failure during a future launch, the thrusters can ignite and carry the Crew Dragon safely away from a disintegrating rocket.

SpaceX says that a leaky valve caused the propellant needed for these thrusters to cross into another system — one of really high pressure. When this contamination occurred, the high forces slammed the liquid around, causing valuable components to fail and leading to the ultimate loss of the capsule.

Koenigsman said that this contamination definitely was not anticipated, though the kind of valve that leaked has been known to have some internal leakage problem. Ultimately, he acknowledged that, to some extent, this was a design issue. “It’s something that the components should not have done,” Koenigsman said. “But at the same time, we learned a very valuable lesson on something going forward, one that makes the Crew Dragon a safer vehicle.”

“it was a huge gift for us.” SpaceX will replace all of these types of valves with another component known as a burst disk, which is supposed to be much more reliable, according to Koenigsman. SpaceX claims it has many Crew Dragons in various stages of production at the company’s headquarters in California. However, it’s unclear when the Crew Dragon will fly again. Before the explosion, SpaceX had been planning to fly its first astronauts on the vehicle by the end of the summer. Now it’s looking increasingly likely that SpaceX won’t fly people until the beginning of next year — though Koenigsman isn’t ruling out a 2019 flight. “My emphasis is really on making sure this is safe,” he said. “So end of the year, I don’t think it’s impossible, but it’s getting increasingly difficult.”

However, a NASA representative said she is appreciative for the failure, especially since it occurred on the ground instead of during a flight. “We had the ability to find an issue with the hardware and be able to find the hardware and be able to assess the hardware,” Kathy Lueders, the program manager for NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, said during the press conference. “So it was a huge gift for us.”









In This Stream

Next Up In Sign up for the newsletter Processor A newsletter about computers

Loading comments... Share this story

More articles:


All Articles